Who's running the LAPD? Chief's style draws mixed reviews in first year

Image Credit: Wikimedia Commons

By Fritz von Burkersroda

LAPD Chief McDonnell’s First Year: Successes Amid Internal Strains

Who's running the LAPD? Chief's style draws mixed reviews in first year

A Year Defined by Challenges (Image Credits: Pixabay)

Los Angeles – As 2025 draws to a close, the Los Angeles Police Department under Chief Jim McDonnell has managed a turbulent year marked by low crime figures and political backing, yet faces rising discontent from within its ranks.

A Year Defined by Challenges

The past twelve months tested the LAPD’s resilience as Chief McDonnell stepped into the role amid wildfires, protests, and a surge in police-involved incidents. Early in his tenure, the department responded to the January wildfires, which demanded rapid deployment of resources and coordination with other agencies. McDonnell’s team also handled the June protests, resulting in over 400 arrests and drawing national attention to policing tactics. These events highlighted the chief’s ability to maintain operations during high-pressure situations. Still, they exposed underlying issues in departmental readiness and response protocols.

Critics pointed to a series of three shootings over three days in September as a flashpoint, prompting questions about officer training and escalation procedures. Lawsuits over alleged aggressive actions toward journalists and protesters further complicated the landscape. McDonnell addressed these by announcing leadership changes in July, evaluating senior staff based on their crisis performance. Such moves aimed to strengthen command structures but did little to quell immediate concerns. Overall, the year underscored the complexities of leading a large urban force through unforeseen turmoil.

Crime Trends Reach New Lows

One of the brightest spots in McDonnell’s first year came from crime statistics, which hovered near historic lows across Los Angeles. Homicides and violent crimes declined steadily, reflecting effective community policing initiatives rooted in his prior experience. The department credited targeted patrols and data-driven strategies for the improvements, building on reforms from previous administrations. Property crimes also saw reductions, easing burdens on residents and businesses alike. These outcomes bolstered public confidence in the LAPD’s direction.

However, some analysts noted that while overall rates dropped, specific categories like traffic collisions and certain assaults persisted as challenges. McDonnell emphasized sustained efforts in his recent discussions on 2025 priorities, including enhanced recruitment to maintain staffing levels. The low crime environment provided a foundation for broader reforms, yet it contrasted sharply with internal debates over how to sustain these gains. Department leaders viewed the figures as validation of their approach, even as external pressures mounted.

Political Support Versus Rank-and-File Tensions

At City Hall, Chief McDonnell secured robust endorsements, with council members praising his handling of crises and commitment to low crime. Funding requests, though partially scaled back – such as the recent approval of $1 million for hiring instead of $4.4 million – still signaled trust in his vision. This political alignment allowed for policy continuity and resource allocation focused on modernization. McDonnell’s background, including his time as a sheriff and LAPD veteran, resonated with officials seeking stability. The support extended to overlooking some operational hiccups in favor of long-term progress.

Inside the department, however, frustrations grew over what many described as a hands-off leadership style. Officers and commanders expressed concerns about inconsistent discipline, with complaints of leniency in misconduct cases surfacing in internal meetings. A fall gathering saw a captain publicly question McDonnell’s oversight role, highlighting perceived gaps in accountability. These tensions risked morale, especially amid high-profile payouts for liability claims totaling over $107 million in the fiscal year. While the chief advocated for a decentralized model to empower divisions, it fueled perceptions of detachment from daily operations.

Leadership Evolution and Future Outlook

McDonnell’s approach drew from his extensive career, including roles in gang units and as chief of staff under prior leaders, where he helped develop community-based policing. Recent announcements of staff rotations aimed to inject fresh perspectives and address discipline issues head-on. The chief also prioritized technology upgrades and training to align with consent decree requirements from past reforms. These steps suggested an adaptive style, responsive to both external acclaim and internal feedback. As the department eyes 2026, balancing autonomy with oversight remains a key focus.

Looking forward, McDonnell warned of potential public safety risks if staffing dips further, urging fuller budget commitments. His tenure so far illustrates the delicate balance required in modern policing, where achievements coexist with critiques. The LAPD’s path under his guidance will likely hinge on bridging divides between leadership and the frontline.

Key Takeaways

  • Crime rates in Los Angeles reached near-historic lows, crediting McDonnell’s strategic initiatives.
  • City Hall provided strong political support, aiding crisis navigation and funding efforts.
  • Internal frustrations centered on officer discipline and a perceived hands-off approach, prompting calls for tighter oversight.

In a city as dynamic as Los Angeles, McDonnell’s first year reminds us that effective leadership often means managing triumphs alongside tough conversations – what adjustments do you believe the LAPD needs next? Share your thoughts in the comments.

Leave a Comment