For any feedback please reach out to [email protected]
- 12 Regular People Who Accidentally Shaped Civilization - May 15, 2025
- The 9 Most Misunderstood Novels of All Time - May 15, 2025
- 20 Geniuses Who Changed History With One Brilliant Idea - May 15, 2025
Great Expectations by Charles Dickens
When Charles Dickens first penned “Great Expectations,” the fate he imagined for Pip and Estella was heartbreakingly final. In his original ending, Pip and Estella part ways forever, leaving readers with a sense of loss and resignation. This version was so bleak that Dickens’ close friends, including the novelist Edward Bulwer-Lytton, urged him to reconsider. Swayed by their encouragement, Dickens rewrote the ending to grant Pip and Estella a bittersweet reunion, hinting at hope for their future. Today, both endings are printed in many editions, giving readers a rare chance to choose the version that resonates most with them. The existence of two endings is a testament to the power of reader influence and Dickens’ willingness to adapt his vision. It’s a striking example of how even literary giants sometimes bend to the wishes of their audience, forever changing the way a classic is remembered.
The Picture of Dorian Gray by Oscar Wilde
Oscar Wilde’s “The Picture of Dorian Gray” shocked Victorian society with its decadent themes and dark morality. What many don’t know is that the first version Wilde submitted was heavily censored by editors before its 1890 publication. Passages exploring Dorian’s relationships and moral decline were cut, softening the book’s impact and changing its conclusion’s resonance. Later, Wilde restored this material for subsequent editions, allowing the novel’s original, more explicit vision to shine through. This restoration altered the tone and deepened the tragic nature of Dorian’s downfall, making the ending far more powerful. Wilde’s struggle with censorship highlights the tension between societal norms and artistic expression. By comparing the different versions, readers witness firsthand how the smallest editorial decisions can reshape a story’s entire message.
A Farewell to Arms by Ernest Hemingway
Ernest Hemingway, ever the perfectionist, was famously dissatisfied with the ending of “A Farewell to Arms.” According to his own accounts and later biographical research, Hemingway wrote a staggering 39 alternative endings for the novel. These ranged from utterly tragic conclusions to ones that left room for a glimmer of hope. Some of these alternate versions have since been published, allowing readers to see the different emotional directions Hemingway considered. The process reveals his struggle to authentically capture the chaos and unpredictability of war and love. In the end, the published version remains stark and devastating, yet knowing about the many discarded endings adds a fascinating layer to the reading experience. Hemingway’s creative process is a powerful reminder of how hard authors work to find the “right” way to close a story.
The Catcher in the Rye by J.D. Salinger
J.D. Salinger’s “The Catcher in the Rye” remains one of the most enigmatic novels of the twentieth century, particularly because of its ambiguous conclusion. What’s less known is that Salinger considered a radically different ending, one in which Holden Caulfield suffers a complete breakdown and is institutionalized. Reports from biographers and literary scholars suggest that Salinger wrestled with how much to reveal about Holden’s fate. In the end, he opted for an open-ended finish that has fueled endless debate among readers and critics. This decision leaves Holden’s future uncertain, mirroring the uncertainty that so many young people feel. The possibility of a more definitive ending shows how different the novel’s legacy could have been—and just how deliberate Salinger was in crafting his own brand of literary mystery.
Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde by Robert Louis Stevenson
The story of “Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde” is almost as dramatic behind the scenes as it is on the page. Robert Louis Stevenson’s wife, Fanny, reportedly read the first draft and was so dismayed by the ending that she burned the manuscript. Stevenson then rewrote the novel, giving it a darker, clearer moral conclusion. The version we know today, with its chilling sense of horror and moral reckoning, was shaped in direct response to this domestic critique. The destruction of the original manuscript has become the stuff of literary legend, fueling speculation about what that first ending may have been. Stevenson’s willingness to start anew reflects both the influence of those closest to him and the importance of second chances in artistic creation. The result is a classic tale that continues to unsettle and intrigue.
Little Women by Louisa May Alcott
“Little Women” by Louisa May Alcott is beloved for its warmth and realism, but its ending was not the author’s first choice. Alcott never wanted Jo March to marry; she envisioned her as an independent woman, devoted to her writing and family. However, readers clamored for Jo to find love, pressuring Alcott through letters and public opinion. Eventually, Alcott gave in, introducing Professor Bhaer as Jo’s unlikely suitor and altering the course of the novel. This compromise between artistic intent and public demand demonstrates how audience expectations can influence even the most personal of stories. The alternate ending—Jo remaining single—would have been radical for its time, and its absence is still debated by fans today. The published ending remains a fascinating example of how the desires of readers can bend the pen of an author.
The Lord of the Rings by J.R.R. Tolkien
J.R.R. Tolkien’s “The Lord of the Rings” is famous for its epic scope and triumphant conclusion, but Tolkien once considered a much darker finale. Early drafts and letters reveal that he toyed with the idea of Frodo failing in his quest, allowing Sauron to reclaim the One Ring and plunge Middle-earth into darkness. This version was ultimately abandoned in favor of the bittersweet victory we know. However, traces of the original concept remain, particularly in the novel’s sense of loss and the lingering effects of evil. Tolkien’s willingness to contemplate defeat speaks to the complexity of his moral universe. The alternate ending, had it been published, would have transformed the series into a stark meditation on the cost of failure and the fragility of hope.
1984 by George Orwell
“1984” by George Orwell is notorious for its chilling depiction of totalitarianism triumphing over the human spirit. Yet, in early drafts, Orwell considered a different fate for Winston and Julia: rather than being psychologically broken, they would die physically, possibly in a blaze of rebellion. The final version, where the protagonists are emotionally and mentally crushed, was chosen to underscore the inescapable power of Big Brother. This shift in ending dramatically intensifies the novel’s message about psychological control and the futility of resistance. The evolution of Orwell’s conclusion demonstrates how the tone of a story can be altered by a single, critical decision. The alternate ending would have left readers with a different kind of despair—one rooted in action and consequence rather than internal defeat.
The Time Machine by H.G. Wells
H.G. Wells’ “The Time Machine” is celebrated for its imaginative vision of the future, but few realize the ending we know is not the only one Wells wrote. An early, unpublished manuscript took a far bleaker turn, with the Time Traveller returning to a devastated Earth, completely devoid of humanity. This apocalyptic scenario was ultimately replaced by the more enigmatic ending where the Time Traveller disappears, his fate unknown. The unpublished ending paints a stark warning about the dangers of unchecked technological progress and humanity’s potential self-destruction. By choosing a more mysterious conclusion, Wells left the door open for hope—or dread—depending on the reader’s perspective. This change emphasizes the profound impact an ending can have on a story’s legacy.
The Trial by Franz Kafka
Franz Kafka’s “The Trial” is shrouded in mystery, both in its content and its creation. Kafka, tormented by self-doubt, instructed his friend Max Brod to destroy the unfinished manuscript after his death. Brod defied these wishes and published the novel posthumously, leaving it with its famously unresolved, fragmented structure. Scholars have debated what Kafka’s true ending might have been, had he finished the book and approved its publication. The version we have, with its abrupt and incomplete feel, has become an essential part of the novel’s character, mirroring the senselessness and chaos of the bureaucratic world Kafka sought to portray. The story of its publication is as compelling as the narrative itself, offering a rare glimpse into the struggle between an author’s intent and the legacy others create for them.
Christian Wiedeck, all the way from Germany, loves music festivals, especially in the USA. His articles bring the excitement of these events to readers worldwide.
For any feedback please reach out to [email protected]
